Faculty of Social Sciences, University of Tehran Sociological Review 1010-2809 26 2 2020 02 20 The Realation of Objectivity and Value-dependence in Social Science in Muslim Philosophers’ Thought The Realation of Objectivity and Value-dependence in Social Science in Muslim Philosophers’ Thought 99 122 75860 10.22059/jsr.2019.75860 FA Mahdi Hosseinzadeh Yazdi Fatemeh Falahnejad Journal Article 2019 04 24 The relationship between value and the social sciences has always been a subject of debate among sociologists as well as philosophers of the social sciences. It is clear that this debate is essentially a philosophical debate, and when the sociologist wears the philosopher's cloak, he discusses it. Many thinkers have maintained that social science must be independent of values ​​in order to maintain the objectivity of the social sciences. Others have cited two sources of discovery and justification for better explaining this purpose or going beyond this radical reading. The lack of clarity in the concepts involved and the inaccuracy of the dispute have added to the ambiguity of the debate. This article examines the meaning, value, objectivity and disaggregation of the social sciences into six positions, discoveries, concepts, justifications, acceptance of theory, recommendation and application. While explaining the requirements of each official, we try to take the path of clarification by using the foundations of muslim philosophers. The relationship between value and the social sciences has always been a subject of debate among sociologists as well as philosophers of the social sciences. It is clear that this debate is essentially a philosophical debate, and when the sociologist wears the philosopher's cloak, he discusses it. Many thinkers have maintained that social science must be independent of values ​​in order to maintain the objectivity of the social sciences. Others have cited two sources of discovery and justification for better explaining this purpose or going beyond this radical reading. The lack of clarity in the concepts involved and the inaccuracy of the dispute have added to the ambiguity of the debate. This article examines the meaning, value, objectivity and disaggregation of the social sciences into six positions, discoveries, concepts, justifications, acceptance of theory, recommendation and application. While explaining the requirements of each official, we try to take the path of clarification by using the foundations of muslim philosophers. https://jsr.ut.ac.ir/article_75860_9439d3d97ba4e562edc0b69a0fd9d714.pdf