This article is an attempt to study the role of power and factors involved in formation of Iranian public sphere in the postmodern period. We will use Foucault's reverse method in order to analyze the sources of producing power and how power is being exercised in postmodern world. We will use Foucault's approach to bio-power in order to be able to identify how power is being produced and how it is being exercised and how it leads to formation or lack of formation of public sphere. We have also used Foucault's reverse method so to address some historical breaks that might have occurred in postmodern world.
Application of the Foucauldiannotion of historical break contributed to identifying two theoretical and empirical findings. The first break is offered in the area of theoretical analysis in which we refer to the postmodern controlled society as Negri and Hardt put it in “Empire”. This argument will clarify how the postmodern power uses new media in order to exercise its influence through the process of communicating mode of control. Contrary to Habermas's approach to internet and its power to development of public sphere we indicate that this has become a postmodern panopticon type of control and a virtual factory in which users behave in a similar manner as postmodern workers in which they use their emotional work so to strengthen the bio-power of capitalism. It seems as if the imprisonment, control and exploitation of subjects is taking place in internet and makes it hard for internet to be transformed into public sphere.
The second break (based on our empirical findings) indicates that it is the centrality of culture and history that contributes to the formation of public sphere as it creates ground for realization of power of masses. Our 2009 field research results in Iran indicates that power of masses which takes its roots from historical as well as Islamic factors can provide the grounds for formation of Iranian public sphere.
Using the results of second break we will indicate that our conclusion for the first break is also valid as we believe internet alone cannot lead to the formation of Iranian public sphere. Other results also indicate that power of masses can be deny the postmodern technologies and this is all because Iranian society enjoys historical and cultural factors that can help formation of an indigenous public sphere that has global orientations.
مرداک، گراهام (1389) "فراتر از پساها؛ بازاندیشی تغییر، بازیابی نقد"، ترجمه‌ی گودرز میرانی، نظریه‌های ارتباطات، ویراسته‌ی سعیدرضا عاملی، جلد چهارم، تهران: پژوهشکده‌ی مطالعات فرهنگی و اجتماعی.
نبوی، سید عباس (1386) فلسفه قدرت، تهران: انتشارات حوزه و دانشگاه.
نوذری، حسینعلی (1385) صورت‌بندی مدرنیته و پست‌مدرنیته، تهران: نشر نی.
هارت و نگری (1384) امپراطوری، ترجمه‌ی رضا نجف‌زاده، تهران: قصیده‌سرا.
هارت و نگری (1386) انبوه خلق، جنگ و دموکراسی در عصر امپراطوری، ترجمه‌ی رضا نجف‌زاده، نشر نی.
هارلند، ریچارد (1380) ابرساخت‌گرایی، ترجمه‌ی فرزان سجودی، تهران: پژوهشگاه فرهنگ و هنر اسلامی.
کتابنامه لاتین:
Beresford, A. D. (2003). “Foucault’s Theory of Governance and the Deterrence of Internet Fraud”.ADMINISTRATION & SOCIETY. Vol. 35 No. 1. March 2003. 82-103. available at: http://ejournal.narotama.ac.id/files/82.pdf
Birch, K. (2006). “The Neoliberal Underpinnings of the Bioeconomy: The Ideological Discourses and Practices of Economic Competitiveness”. Genomics, Society and Policy 2(3): 1-15. Article Online .
Bringle, R. G., and Hatcher, J. A. (2000), “Successful Service-learning Programs: New Models of Excellence in Higher Education”. The Journal of Higher Education. 71, (4), 504-507.
Curran, J. (2002), Media and Power, New York: Routledge, 7th edition.
Danet, B. (2002), “Communication and Culture on the Internet”. European Union Summer School. University of Rome. June 2002. Lecture I. available at:
Foucault, M. (1977) “Nietzsche, Genealogy, History”. In Language, Counter-Memory,. Practice: Selected Essays and Interviews, edited by D. F. Bouchard, Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Foucault, M. (1972). The Archaeology of Knowledge. Translated by A. M. Sheridan Smith. London: Tavostock.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2005). Multitude: War and Democracy In The Age Of Empire. London: Penguin Books.
Hardt, M. & Negri, A. (2000). Empire. New York: Harvard University Press.
Hier, S. Greenberg, P. Walby, K. & Lett, D. (2007). “Media, Communication and the Establishment of Public Camera Surveillance Programmes in Canada”, Media Culture Society, September 2007 Vol. 29. No. 5 727-751.
Holland, N. N. (1996). “The Internet Regression”. in John Suler (Eds)., The Psychology of Cyberspace (1996), Department of English - University of Florida Gainesville, FL 32611-2036 U.S.A. Available at: http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/holland.html
Jensen, M. J. & Danziger, J. N. (2002). “Civil Society and Cyber Society: The Role of the Internet in Community Associations and Democratic Politics”. The Information Society. 23: 39–50. 2007. Available at:
Jordan, T. (1999), Cyberpower, the Culture and Politics of Cyberspace and the Internet, London: Routledge.
King, M. (2009), “Clarifying the Foucault–Habermas Debate, Morality, Ethics, and `Normative Foundations”. Philosophy Social Criticism.March 2009 Vol. 35 No. 3. 287-314, Available at: http://psc.sagepub.com/cgi/content/abstract/35/3/287
Koolstra, C. M. & Bos, M. J. (2009) “The Development of An Instrument to Determine Deferent livels of Interactivity”. The International Communication Gazette. 1748-0485; Vol. 71(5): 373–391; DOI: 10.1177/1748048509104980. Available at:
Lyon, D. (1994). The Rise of Surveillance Society. Cambridge. UK: Polity.
MacDonald, M. (2006). “Empire and Communication: the Media Wars of Marshall McLuhan”. Media, Culture & Society. 2006. SAGE Publications (London, Thousand Oaks and New Delhi), Vol. 28 (4): 505–520. [ISSN: 0163-4437 DOI: 10.1177/0163443706062912]. Available at:
McKinlay, A. (2006). “Managing Foucault: Genealogies of Management”. Management & Organizational History. February 2006 vol. 1. No. 1.87-100. Available at:
Morgan, J. (2006). “Interview with Michael Hardt Theory”. Culture & Society. Vol. 23(5): 93–113.
Munro, I. (2000). “Non-Disciplinary Power and the Network Society. Organization. 7, 4, 679-695.
Poster, M. (2001(. What's the Matter with the Internet. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Poster, M. (1990(. The Mode of Information. Cambridge: Polity.
Press, A. & Livingeston, S. (2006). “Taking Audience Research in to the Age of New Media; Old Problems and New Challenges”. in Mimi whaite and James schwoch (eds.). Questions of Method in Cultural Studies, Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
Riva, G & Galimberti, C. (Eds.) (2003). Towards Cyber Psychology: Mind, Cognitions and Society in the Internet Age, Amsterdam: IOS Press.
Rohle, T (2005). “Power, Reason, Closure: Critical Perspectives on New Media Theory”. New Media & Society. London. Thousand Oaks, CA and New Delhi, Vol. 7(3):403–422. [DOI: 10.1177/1461444805052283]. Available at:
Schiller, D. (1999). Digital Capitalism: Networking the Global Market System. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Smith, P. (2001). Cultural Theory; an Introduction, Massachusetts: Blakwell Publisher.
Suler, J. (2005), “Adolescents in Cyberspace; the Good, the Bad, and the Ugly”. The Psychology of Cyberspace. This article created in June 98. Revised Feb 2005 (v1.5). Available at: http://www.rider.edu/~suler/psycyber/adoles.htm
Suler, John (2003). “The Online Disinhibition Effect”. Cyber Psychology and Behavior, 7, 321-326.
Tamara, Dimitrijevic (2003), IT and Psychology: New Trends, Psychology Department, City College Thessaloniki, Affiliated Institution of the University of Sheffield, dimitrijevic@city.academic.gr
Willcocks, L. P. (2006). “Michel Foucault in the Social Study of ICTs, Critique and Reappraisal”. Social Science Computer Review.Fall 2006.Vol. 24. No. 3. 274-295.
Žižek, S. (2012). “The Revolt of the Salaried Bourgeoisie” in London Review of Books, Vol. 34. No. 2. January 26. 2012. accessed on April 19, 2012. URL:
abdolahian, H., & Vakili ghazi jahani, M. (2014). An Analysis of the Postmodern Public Sphere with Application of Foucauldian Reverse Methodology to New Media. Sociological Review, 20(2), 83-110. doi: 10.22059/jsr.2014.56274
MLA
hamid abdolahian; Mohammad Vakili ghazi jahani. "An Analysis of the Postmodern Public Sphere with Application of Foucauldian Reverse Methodology to New Media", Sociological Review, 20, 2, 2014, 83-110. doi: 10.22059/jsr.2014.56274
HARVARD
abdolahian, H., Vakili ghazi jahani, M. (2014). 'An Analysis of the Postmodern Public Sphere with Application of Foucauldian Reverse Methodology to New Media', Sociological Review, 20(2), pp. 83-110. doi: 10.22059/jsr.2014.56274
VANCOUVER
abdolahian, H., Vakili ghazi jahani, M. An Analysis of the Postmodern Public Sphere with Application of Foucauldian Reverse Methodology to New Media. Sociological Review, 2014; 20(2): 83-110. doi: 10.22059/jsr.2014.56274
)