نوع مقاله : علمی وپزوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانش آموخته دکترای جامعه شناسی فرهنگی
2 عضو هئیت علمی گروه علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه گیلان
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Laclau and Mouffe's approach can be considered as a theoretical , political and antagonistic battle.this approach gives to prominanace the contingent formulation of hegemoy for removing Marxism from the streaks of uncompromising Stalinist logic which showes its Jacobin imagination. The emergence of hegemony conjoined to the continjental transfer of the mission of the bourgeoisie to the proletariat in the Marxist discourse from the Second International onwards. This event was the beginning of the manifestation of the logic of contingence and a multifaceted effort in rejecting the logic of historical necessity that formed the crisis of Marxism and the incompatibility of new developments to it. Antonio Gramsci, as a decisive and original moment in the rejection of the chain of historical necessity, because of his essentialist approach to the hegemonic class and his important for infrastructure was incapable of formulating a new political logic of hegemony., Laclau and Mouffe, pursuit of this goal, while setting aside the essentialist element of Gramsci's approach and with the help of Althusser's and Lacan's theoretical apparatuses in proposing concepts such as the impossibility of the social, articulation and antagonism, establish hegemony in an all contingent realm.How to formulate the complete logic of hegemonic through the decisive negation of the chain of historical necessity and the absolute approval of the contingent logic, that is, the embodiment of the idea of "hegemony as an articulation" in the approach of Lacla and Mouffe, construct the center of this paper.
کلیدواژهها [English]