نوع مقاله : علمی وپزوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه حقوق عمومی و بین الملل دانشگاه شیراز
2 دانشیار مطالعات ایران در دانشگاه ملی استرالیا
3 دانش آموخته دکتری حقوق بین الملل و پژوهشگر میهمان در دانشگاه کویینز، کانادا
چکیده
کلیدواژه‌ها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
The contemporary landscape grapples with the intricate tapestry of identity, presenting formidable challenges that obstruct the pursuit of societal stability and tranquility. As the paradigm of security evolves beyond its erstwhile government-centric framework, a broader, more inclusive conception has emerged, prompting a fundamental reassessment of perceived threats and their requisite solutions. This article posits that while group identities—spanning religious, ethnic, national, linguistic, and sexual orientations—should not inherently serve as catalysts for a "security crisis," their politicization assumes a pivotal role in fomenting societal discord. Rather than the identities themselves posing inherent threats, it is the strategic manipulation and politicization of these identities that engender turbulence within societies.
Central to this exploration is the theory of "relative deprivation," which illuminates the pivotal role of perceived disparities between groups in societal dynamics. This theory elucidates how disparities in perceived resources, opportunities, or recognition can sow seeds of discontent and drive social tensions. The study meticulously examines the profound impact of this phenomenon on the fabric of social security.
In delineating the correlation between the politicization of group identities and the ensuing ramifications on social stability, this research underscores how such politicization becomes a potent catalyst, undermining the cohesive fabric of society at various levels—be it within local communities, regional landscapes, or the global sphere. Understanding the intricacies of this relationship is imperative for formulating strategies aimed at fortifying societal cohesion and resilience against burgeoning security threats.
کلیدواژه‌ها [English]
استانفورد، کوهن، (1384). تئوری‌های انقلاب، ترجمه‌ی علیرضا طیب، تهران: نشر قومس.
گور، تد رابرت، (1388). چرا انسان‌ها شورش می‌کنند؟، ترجمه‌ی علی مرشدی زاد، چاپ سوم، تهران: پژوهشکده مطالعات راهبردی.
مالشویچ سینسا، (1390). جامعه‌شناسی قومیت، ترجمه‌ی پرویز دلیرپور، تهران: نشر آمه.
Abrams, D., & Hogg, M. A. (1990). Social Identity Theory: Constructive and Critical Advances. Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Allan, J. (2017). An Analysis of Albert Bandura’s Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. CRC Press.
Benhabib, Seyla.Shaoiro, Ian. Petranovic, Danilo, (eds.). (2007) Identities, Affilaions, and Allegiances, Cambridge University Press.
Bendict, A, (1991) Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism, London: Verso.
Boring, E. G. (1993). Review of Frustration and Aggression [Review of Review of Frustration and Aggression, by J. Dollard, L. W. Doob, N. E. Miller, O. H. Mowrer, R. R. Sears, C. S. Ford, C. I. Hovland, & R. T. Sollenberger]. The American Journal of Psychology, 52(3), 480–483. https://doi.org/10.2307/1416767/
Buzan, B, (1991). People, States and Fear: An Agenda for International Security Studies in the Post-Cold War Era, London: Harvester Wheatsheaf.
Buzan, B,, in O. Waever, B. Buzan, M. Kelstrup, P. Lemaitre (eds), (1993), Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, London: Pinter Publisher Ltd.
Buzan, B (1997), ‘Rethinking Security after the Cold War’, Co-operation and Conflicts, 32/1.
Cox, M. (2007), Morgenthau, Hans J., realism, and the rise and fall of the Cold War. In, Michael C. Williams., Realism Reconsides, the legacy of Hans J. Morgenthau in International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Buzan, B (1998), Weaver, Ole., De Wilde J., Security, A New Framework For Analysis (London: Lynne Rienner Publisher.
Davies, J. C. (1962). Toward a Theory of Revolution. American Sociological Review, 27(1), 5–19. https://doi.org/10.2307/2089714/
Esman, M, J. (2004). An Introduction to Ethnic Conflicts, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Esman, M, J. (1994). Ethnic Politics, New York: Cornell University Press.
Fenton Steve. (2003). Ethnicity, Cambridge: polity.
Gurr, Ted.R. (1971). Why Men Rebel, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
Gurr, Ted.R. (1994). People against States: Ethnopolitical Conflict and the Changing World System, International Studies Quarterly.38/3.
Gore, Ted.R. (2009). chera emsanha shouresh mikonand? Translation Ali Morshidi Zad, Third edition, Tehran: pajoheshkade motaleat rahbordi. [In Persian]
Haynes, J, (1996). Third World Politics. A Concise Introduction, Oxford: Blackwell.
Hough, P, (2013) Understanding Global Security, Routldege.
Jervis, R(1978), ‘Cooperation under the Security Dilemma’, World Politics 30.
Joireman, S, F. (2003). Nationalism and Political Identity. London: Continuum.
Katzenstein, P, J, (1996), The Culture of National Security. Norms and Identity in World Politics, New York: Columbia University Press.
Malesevic, S, (2006), Identity as ideology, understanding ethnicity and nationalism, Palgrave Macmillan
Malshevich S, (2005), jamee shenasi ghomiat, Translation Parviz Delirpour, Tehran: Publishers Aameh. [In Persian]
Moaddel, M, (1993). Class, Politics, and I deology in the Iranian Revolutions, New York: Columbia University Press. [In Persian]
Migdal Joel S. (2001). State in Society. Studing how States and Societies Transform and Continuete one Another, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Reyntjens, F. (2011). Constructing the truth, dealing with dissent, domesticating the world: Governance in post-genocide Rwanda. African Affairs, 110(438), 1–34. https://doi.org/10.1093/afraf/adq075/
Roy, Oliver. (2004), Globalized Islam. The Search for a New Ummah, New York: Columbia University Press.
Saleh, A, (2011), Broading the Concept of Security: Identity and Societal Security, Geopolitics Quarterly, Vol 6, No 4.
Shaw, M, (1994), Global Society and International Relations, Cambridge: Polity Press.
Schermerhon, Richard.A. (1970). Comparative Ethnic Relations: A Framework for Theory and research, New York: Random House.
Sheehan, M (2005), International Security, An Analytical survey, London: lynne Rienner Publishers.
Stanford, C, (2005), teorihay enghelab, Translation Alireza Tayeb, Tehran: Publishers Qomes.
Turner, Jonathan, (1998) The Structure of Sociological Theory, New York: Wads Worth Publishing Company.
Waever, Ole; Buzan, Barry; Kelstrup, Morten(1993), Lemaitre, Pierre., Identity, Migration and the New Security Agenda in Europe, London: Pinter Publishers Ltd.
Wodtke, K. H., & Brown, B. R. (1967). Social Learning and Imitation. Review of Educational Research, 37(5), 514–538. https://doi.org/10.2307/1169510/
Zahed. S. (2004) Iranian National Identity in the Context of Globalization: Dialogue or resistance? CSGR Working Paper. No. 162/05.
', './data/jsr/coversheet/cover_fa.jpg'))