نوع مقاله : علمی وپزوهشی
نویسندگان
1 دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشیار دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
One of the significant shortcomings of social sciences in our country is the lack or even absence of theories about social harms, such as divorce, poverty, marginalization, addiction, and unemployment. Social scientists are expected to be able to describe, analyze, and scientifically and efficiently explain the causes and factors that cause them in Iran, and to provide the scientific community and the country's executive managers with strategies and solutions to manage and reduce them, leading to an improvement in the country's social situation. One of the scientific methods that can lead to a deep, first-hand, and indigenous understanding of social reality is phenomenology, which many researchers have used to analyze social harms; of course, achieving this goal requires sufficient mastery of the methodological framework of phenomenology and adherence to this framework in practice. However, many of these studies suffer from methodological irregularities; in this sense, for whatever reason, they have failed to properly observe the fundamental assumptions of the interpretivist paradigm and the phenomenological method in their research. In this study, with the help of paradigmatic methodology, we seek to answer this fundamental question: What are the paradigmatic methodological indicators of the phenomenological method and how can these indicators be used to evaluate and critique research to improve and enhance its coherence and scientific validity?
کلیدواژهها [English]
', './data/jsr/coversheet/cover_fa.jpg'))