نوع مقاله : علمی وپزوهشی
نویسندگان
1 استادیار گروه علوم اجتماعی اسلامی دانشگاه تهران
2 دانشجوی دکتری رشتۀ دانش اجتماعی مسلمین دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
Knowledge seeks the scientific understanding of a phenomena and here, subject, method and purpose, have a special significance. They are formed on the basis of noetic presuppositions, which are called paradigms in brief. Sociology is a multi-paradigm science and study and critique of these paradigms and their theoretical consequences is one of the tasks taking into account by philosophy of the social sciences. The need for such studies becomes even more apparent when we find that many researchers are not so familiar with the noetic presuppositions and paradigms of social sciences methods. Ignoring this paradigmatic system has various consequences; for instance, achieving a new theory can be expected no more. Sentiment to this noetic disorder increases when the research subject is issues such as addiction, divorce and poverty; because people expect the social sciences to be able to find strategies to reduce or remove them. When such a goal is not met, a crucial question arises: What is the main problem of researches in this category? We believe that one of the main problems of these researches is methodological issues. Accordingly, in the present article, we try to answer this basic question that "what methodological gaps are involved in divorce articles in Iran?" we got the following answers:
Dominance of positive attitude;
In advance known Results and lack of increasing knowledge;
Lack of foresight, suggestion and control;
Lack of value neutrality measurement;
Disregarding the theoretical nature of concepts.
کلیدواژهها [English]
', './data/jsr/coversheet/711649487960.jpg'))