نوع مقاله : علمی وپزوهشی
نویسندگان
1 گروه انسان شناسی، دانشکده علوم اجتماعی، دانشگاه تهران
2 گروه انسان شناسی دانشکده علوم اجتماعی دانشگاه تهران
چکیده
کلیدواژهها
عنوان مقاله [English]
نویسندگان [English]
History, Anthropology, and Psychoanalysis are three areas of knowledge that have intersected in various ways over the past few decades. While their interactions have been synergistic in some cases, they have also given rise to numerous ambiguities and complications. This article focuses on the enduring and controversial phenomenon known as "Psychohistory," which represents the convergence of these three disciplines. Initially, we explore the Freud’s own approach to engaging with historical subjects, followed by an examination of the later epistemological and methodological adjustments that have contributed to the emergence of Psychohistory. Additionally, we scrutinize the challenges faced by Psychohistory in terms of institutional recognition and its marginalization within academic traditions. We also discuss the reasons behind its notorious popularity. Ultimately, we explore the current potential of Psychohistory, despite its marginal status. Our argument posits that, although Psychohistory has not achieved official recognition as a distinctive discipline, it has provided an opportunity for fields such as History and Anthropology to critically assess their own positions. To put it differently, Psychohistory has transmuted into a form of Meta-history. The inclusion of the concept of "transferential processes" within the framework of Psychohistory was pretty essential in order to effectively increase its capacity. Psychohistory now more than ever provokes contemporary anthropologists and historians to place great significance on their reciprocal exchanges pertaining to the materials and subjects under their examination.
کلیدواژهها [English]
', './data/jsr/coversheet/cover_fa.jpg'))